Skip to main content

The Seven "C's" of Employee Engagement

We've all seen the studies that speak to the impact on productivity of employees who give their company their discretionary effort.  The person who pulls an all-nighter to be ready for a customer presentation.  Or the one who travels tirelessly to connect a company globally.  When our employees go "above and beyond" to achieve, we say they are engaged.  And we all want to know how to make more engaged employees.

My experience teaches the there are seven "C's" of employee engagement.  I must credit IBM with the beginnings of this framework, as I learned most of this from my time with IBM in Chicago.  I've tested this informally ever since and have yet to find a framework that is more memorable and relevant.

So, what are the seven "C's" of employee engagement?  Here goes:
  1. Customer Capability (I'll count two "C's"' here)
  2. Compensation
  3. Career
  4. Connections
  5. Community
  6. Culture

Customer Capability may be the most important and yet most over-looked "C". Employees must be proud of their product and/or service and how it enables customer success.  Ask employees to design, sell, make, deliver, service or bill for products or services that are a poor value for their customer, and over time they will offer less and less of their discretionary effort.  I'll write more about this and post to this blog later.

Compensation is a pre-requisite for engagement in two ways.  First, employees must perceive that their base rate of compensation is competitive within their market. Especially today in the age of Linked In and other such social media, where headhunters can identify and contact employees with ease, having a competitive, market-based rate of pay is a must.  In addition, employees must associate recognition and reward with accomplishment.  If genuine accomplishment requires "above and beyond" effort, then it is not hard to see that a company will need to recognize and reward such effort in order to sustain it.  Sustained "above and beyond" effort is employee engagement.

Career is so important to engagement and, in my experience, the number one reason why employees are not engaged.  If employees are to sustain their engagement, they must be working in service of something bigger and more meaningful than the next merit increase or promotion.  They must have a career goal in mind, and they must context their accomplishment and professional development against that goal.  When this exists, so does discretionary effort.  When it doesn't, my experience teaches that "above and beyond" effort is not sustained.  I'll write more about this and post to this blog later.

Connections are another imperative of employee engagement.  This was a particularly challenging imperative in the sales and services world of IBM where the old IBM means "I've Been Moved" was transforming to IBM means "I'm By Myself".  In the sales and services world, IBM had either road warriors who traveled constantly or people who were deployed 100% to a customer location.  In more and more instances, employees found themselves living and working in places far away from their managers.  Creating linkages to colleagues and mentors and yes, even one's manager was seen as essential to the attainment of one's discretionary effort.  I'll write more about this and post to this blog later.

Similarly, a company's place in the Community in which its employees live and work is an essential of engagement.  Commitment to community makes employees proud to be associated with their company and brings a measure of stature to those who can say they work there.  I've seen this again and again with companies like Intel in Oregon, IBM in New York, Cisco in Silicon Valley and Lockheed Martin in Dallas / Fort Worth.  Miss on this and a company will not sustain employee engagement.

The last "C" of employee engagement is Culture.  Simply put, if a company is to have engaged employees it must care about engaging employees.  Caring about means prioritizing and resourcing efforts to earn their discretionary effort; meaning, this must be supported by the most senior leadership.  Senior leadership sets the culture through its priorities and investments.

Where might senior leadership start?  Context priorities and investments against the first six "C's" as an enabling framework.  Solve for customer capability, compensation, career, connections and community and you'll have a culture of employee engagement.



Paul E. DuCharme. October 2012



Comments

  1. We are a leading executive search firm with years of experience finding talent that delivers results.Our recruitment consultants combine professional search experience with industry-specific expertise.

    HRMS Pakistan

    ReplyDelete
  2. We are a leading executive search firm with years of experience finding talent that delivers results.Our recruitment consultants combine professional search experience with industry-specific expertise.

    Top HR firms Pakistan

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

You May Know More About Managing Millennials Than You Think!

New and not so new labels - Baby Boomer, Generation X, Millennial (aka GenY) - are being bantered around our workplaces today and challenging our thoughts about effective management practice.  Baby Boomer and Generation X leaders like you want to know how to lead the new entrants into your workforce and fear that your differences may introduce managerial challenges for which you are unprepared.   You may know more about managing your future workforce than you think! Let's start with a short review.  Baby Boomers were born between 1945 and 1964, or between the presidencies of FDR and Lyndon Johnson, and make up about 40% of our US workforce. Generation X'ers were born between 1965 and 1981 (Johnson to Ronald Reagan) and make up about 20% of the same workforce.  The remaining 40% is comprised of Millennials (aka GenY), who were born between 1982 and 1993 (Reagan to Bill Clinton). Dan Schawbel works intensively to help leaders understand how to lead Millennials.  Dan'

Did the Marketing VP Just Say "I Love Recruiting!"?

I've been asked a lot recently about my recruitment philosophy.  I'm sorry to say that the genesis of this question lies in the reality that many senior executives do not perceive that their in-house recruitment teams create value.  They see them as administrative and compliance arms of the HR department; junior people who manage too many open requisitions and are simply not instrumental in the identification, attraction and acquisition of talent. This question has re-surfaced for me a memory of a hiring VP at Cisco who said, "I've never once hired a candidate brought to me by our recruiting department." I also recall, from years ago, a hiring manager at IBM complimenting our recruiting organization for the manner in which the paperwork was processed. So, what does it take to get the Marketing VP or any hiring manager to say "I love our company's recruitment team!" ? My philosophy is that it takes a recruitment team that can teach them to fish,